
PFRMAT TS
TARGET T0126
AUTHOR 6305-9733-7289
REMARK New fold
METHOD PSI-BLAST (Altschul et al., Nucl. Acids Res. 25, 3389-3402, 1997)
METHOD (-h 0.0005 -j 20) and iterative SCANPS
METHOD (Barton et al., 2000, http://barton.ebi.ac.uk/scanps/)
METHOD were run against a combined search set comprising the SWALL, PDB and ENSEMBL
METHOD sequence databases.
METHOD Sequences hit from these runs with an E-value of less than 0.0005 were collected.
METHOD These sequences were then aligned all-against-all using AMPS
METHOD (Barton, G. J., Methods in Enzymology 183, 403-428, 1990)
METHOD and one sequence was removed from any pair sharing greater than 75%
METHOD identity. Each of the remaining sequences was then used as queries
METHOD in a second round of psiblast runs. From these runs there were no
METHOD PDB hits with any significant E-values. With no
METHOD reasonable candidate structures after looking at the results from the MAP
METHOD fold recognition method (Russell, et al., 1996, JMB,259,349-365) it was
METHOD concluded this was likely to be a new fold.
MODEL 1
PARENT NONE
TER
END


