Do we really need human section in CASP9?

Do we really need human section in CASP9?

Postby guest500 on Tue Feb 23, 2010 4:46 pm

Is server prediction enough for CASP9? Is there addition information provided by human test? How useful is the human prediction on its own to the community?
I believe it is time to seriously consider these questions. Discussion is welcome.
guest500
 
Posts: 1
Joined: Tue Feb 23, 2010 4:24 pm

Re: Do we really need human section in CASP9?

Postby davidjohnson on Sat Mar 20, 2010 1:22 am

An important question. Human section should run as many targets as servers.
davidjohnson
 
Posts: 4
Joined: Sat Mar 20, 2010 1:08 am

Re: Do we really need human section in CASP9?

Postby mcguffin on Wed Mar 31, 2010 1:37 am

I've found that the "human" section is useful for testing out new methods before building complete autonomous servers. It gives you more time to check methods, fix bugs etc.
mcguffin
 
Posts: 12
Joined: Mon Aug 04, 2008 6:12 am


Return to CASP Discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests

cron